🔗 Share this article

Throughout financial booms, there come points when financial analysts wonder whether exuberance has become unreasonable.

Recent multi-billion dollar deals between OpenAI with semiconductor makers NVIDIA along with AMD have sparked concerns about the viability of substantial investments toward artificial intelligence technology.

What Makes the NVIDIA and AMD Deals Concerning for Financial Watchers?

Some analysts voice apprehension regarding the reciprocal structure in these arrangements. Under the conditions of NVIDIA's agreement, OpenAI agrees to pay Nvidia in cash for chips, and the company commits to invest into OpenAI in exchange for non-controlling stakes.

Prominent UK technology backer James Anderson expressed concern about similarities with supplier funding, where a company provides financial support to clients purchasing its products – a precarious scenario when these customers hold excessively positive business forecasts.

Vendor financing proved to be one of the characteristics during that turn-of-the-millennium dot-com bubble.

"It is not quite similar to the practices numerous telecommunications suppliers engaged in in 1999-2000, yet there are certain rhymes with it. I don't think it leaves me feeling completely at ease in that perspective regarding this," remarked Anderson.

The Advanced Micro Devices arrangement also enmeshes OpenAI alongside a second chip maker in addition to NVIDIA. Under this deal, OpenAI will use hundreds of thousands of AMD chips in its datacentres – the central nervous systems powering artificial intelligence systems such as ChatGPT – and gaining an opportunity to buy 10% in AMD.

All here is being driven by the thirst of OpenAI as well as competitors to secure as much computing power available to drive their models toward ever greater capability advancements – as well as to meet expanding user needs.

Neil Wilson, UK investor strategist at investment bank Saxo, remarked how transactions like those between NVIDIA and OpenAI all suggested circumstances which "appears, smells and sounds similar to an economic bubble."

What Are Additional Signs Pointing to a Bubble?

Anderson flagged skyrocketing market values among leading AI firms as another source for worry. OpenAI currently worth $500 billion (£372bn), versus $157 billion last October, whereas Anthropic nearly tripled its worth recently, going from $60bn this past March to $170bn last month.

Anderson commented that the magnitude behind these value increases "did bother him." Reports indicate, OpenAI reportedly posted revenue amounting to $4.3 billion in the initial six months of this year, alongside operational losses of $7.8bn, as reported by tech news site The Information.

Recent share price swings have also jolted experienced market watchers. As an example, AMD temporarily gained $80 billion to its market cap during equity trading this past Monday following the OpenAI news, whereas Oracle – a beneficiary from need for AI infrastructure like datacentres – added about $250bn in one day last month following announcing better than expected results.

Additionally, there exists an enormous capital expenditure boom, which refers to expenditure on non-staff expenses including buildings and hardware. The big four AI "hyperscalers" – Meta's parent Meta, Alphabet's owner Alphabet, Microsoft and Amazon – are projected to spend $325 billion on capex in the current year, approximately the GDP of Portugal.

Is Artificial Intelligence Implementation Justifying Investor Excitement?

Faith in the AI expansion was rattled in August when the Massachusetts Institute of Technology published research showing that 95% of organizations receive zero return on their investments in generative AI. Their report stated the problem lay not in the quality of AI systems rather the manner in they were used.

The report indicated this represented a clear example of a "genAI divide", where startups led by 19- or 20-year-olds reporting significant increases in income from deploying AI technologies.

These findings occurred alongside a heavy fall among AI infrastructure stocks such as Nvidia as well as Oracle. This happened 60 days after McKinsey & Company, the consulting firm, said how eight out of 10 businesses state they utilize generative AI, however an identical proportion report no significant effect upon their profitability.

McKinsey explained this is because AI tools are utilized toward general applications such as creating meeting minutes rather than targeted uses such as identifying problematic suppliers and producing concepts.

All here unnerves backers because a key promise by AI companies such as Google, OpenAI and Microsoft is how when organizations purchase their tools, these will enhance productivity – a measure of business performance – through enabling a single employee accomplish much more profitable work in an average business day.

Nevertheless, there are other obvious indications of broad embrace toward AI. Recently, OpenAI stated that ChatGPT is now used by 800 million people a week, rising from the number at 500 million mentioned by OpenAI last March. Sam Altman, OpenAI’s CEO, strongly maintains how demand in paid-for access for AI will persist in "sharply increase."

What the Bigger Picture Show?

Adrian Cox, a thematic strategist at the Deutsche Bank Research Institute, states the current situation feels like "we're at a pivotal point where signals show different colors."

The red lights, he notes, are massive investment spending wherein "existing versions of chips could be outdated before spending yields returns" together with the soaring valuations for privately-held firms such as OpenAI.

The amber signals are over double of the stock values of the "top seven" US technology stocks. This is offset by their price to earnings ratios – a measure of whether a stock stands fairly priced or not – which are below past averages