🔗 Share this article

Thhese days present a quite unique situation: the inaugural US procession of the babysitters. Their attributes range in their expertise and characteristics, but they all possess the common goal – to avert an Israeli violation, or even demolition, of Gaza’s fragile ceasefire. Since the hostilities concluded, there have been few occasions without at least one of Donald Trump’s delegates on the ground. Only this past week saw the arrival of a senior advisor, a businessman, JD Vance and Marco Rubio – all arriving to carry out their duties.

The Israeli government occupies their time. In only a few days it launched a wave of strikes in Gaza after the deaths of two Israeli military personnel – resulting, based on accounts, in dozens of local casualties. Multiple leaders urged a renewal of the fighting, and the Knesset passed a early resolution to annex the occupied territories. The American response was somewhere ranging from “no” and “hell no.”

But in several ways, the US leadership appears more focused on upholding the existing, unstable phase of the truce than on progressing to the following: the rebuilding of Gaza. Regarding this, it appears the US may have ambitions but few specific strategies.

At present, it is unknown when the suggested multinational governing body will truly assume control, and the identical applies to the designated peacekeeping troops – or even the makeup of its members. On a recent day, Vance stated the United States would not force the composition of the foreign unit on the Israeli government. But if the prime minister's cabinet persists to reject multiple options – as it acted with the Turkish suggestion recently – what happens then? There is also the contrary issue: which party will establish whether the forces favoured by Israel are even interested in the assignment?

The matter of the duration it will require to demilitarize Hamas is just as ambiguous. “The expectation in the government is that the multinational troops is going to at this point take charge in demilitarizing Hamas,” remarked the official recently. “That’s may need some time.” Trump only emphasized the uncertainty, saying in an interview recently that there is no “rigid” schedule for Hamas to lay down arms. So, in theory, the unnamed elements of this yet-to-be-formed international force could arrive in Gaza while Hamas fighters continue to remain in control. Are they confronting a governing body or a militant faction? These represent only some of the issues surfacing. Others might wonder what the outcome will be for average residents under current conditions, with the group continuing to focus on its own political rivals and critics.

Recent developments have once again emphasized the blind spots of Israeli journalism on each side of the Gazan frontier. Every source seeks to examine every possible angle of Hamas’s violations of the ceasefire. And, typically, the situation that Hamas has been delaying the repatriation of the remains of killed Israeli captives has monopolized the coverage.

On the other hand, attention of non-combatant deaths in the region resulting from Israeli strikes has garnered minimal attention – if any. Take the Israeli response attacks in the wake of Sunday’s Rafah event, in which two military personnel were lost. While Gaza’s officials reported 44 fatalities, Israeli television analysts questioned the “limited reaction,” which focused on solely installations.

This is nothing new. Over the previous weekend, the press agency accused Israel of infringing the peace with Hamas multiple occasions since the agreement began, killing 38 individuals and injuring another 143. The claim appeared unimportant to most Israeli news programmes – it was merely absent. This applied to accounts that 11 members of a Palestinian household were lost their lives by Israeli troops recently.

The rescue organization said the group had been seeking to go back to their residence in the Zeitoun area of Gaza City when the bus they were in was attacked for allegedly crossing the “demarcation line” that defines areas under Israeli army control. That yellow line is unseen to the ordinary view and shows up just on maps and in official documents – often not obtainable to everyday individuals in the region.

Yet that incident barely received a mention in Israeli news outlets. A major outlet mentioned it shortly on its online platform, citing an Israeli military representative who stated that after a suspect transport was identified, soldiers discharged alerting fire towards it, “but the transport kept to advance on the soldiers in a manner that caused an imminent danger to them. The forces shot to remove the danger, in line with the truce.” No injuries were claimed.

With such perspective, it is no surprise a lot of Israeli citizens think Hamas solely is to blame for breaking the peace. That perception threatens fuelling demands for a more aggressive strategy in Gaza.

Sooner or later – possibly sooner rather than later – it will no longer be enough for American representatives to act as caretakers, advising the Israeli government what to avoid. They will {have to|need